A good day for the Constitution
On Thursday, the House of Representatives took several historic steps towards protecting our system of checks and balances. First, by a vote of 223 to 32, the House passed resolutions referring criminal contempt citations for former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten, as well as authorizing civil actions against them should the Justice Department refuse to prosecute. Second, we did not succumb to the White House political pressure concerning the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Thursday's contempt vote upheld the simple Constitutional principle that no one is above the law. If an ordinary citizen could not ignore a subpoena without facing severe consequences, the same must hold true for the White House.
As this week's papers covered this story, many of them recount the Judiciary Committee investigation that began a year ago. They talk of the fired U.S. Attorneys who testified, the thousands of pages of documents produced by the Department of Justice, and of the subpoenas ignored by the White House. I hope that as you read those stories, you will remember that the path to today's contempt vote did not begin with just a subpoena, or a hearing, or even the firings in December, 2006. Rather, it began with the Bush Administration's politicization of Justice and its refusal to submit to congressional oversight. I commend my 232 colleagues who joined me in voting to hold the Bush White house accountable and who stood up for the rule of law.
I also want to commend the Democratic Leadership for standing up to the White House and refusing to succumb to political pressure concerning the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Last August we allowed ourselves to be jammed by the Senate and the White House. This week, we stood up in the face of the pressure and let the President know that we intend to do our jobs as legislators and not hastily pass the flawed Senate bill with retroactive legal immunity for the telecommunications firms. The White House, of course, has complained bitterly about the contempt vote as they have with many oversight actions Congress has taken.
Much more remains to be done, but this week, we made real progress. With your help, we all made a difference, and the nation and our constitution are stronger for it. Thank you.
- JC's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version








captcha
is crap
Open letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein
“Judge Mukasey’s answers were quick and to the point, and reflected an independent mind. I truly believe he will be a strong advocate for the American people.” --Senator Dianne Feinstein in the the Los Angeles Times
With this statement California'a Senator Feinstein--my Senator--broke ranks with fellow Democrats, sending Michael Mukasey to the Justice department. Today, Rep. John Conyers and the House Judiciary committee are obliged to go to court to compel Attorney General Mukasey to do his job: enforcing subpoenas, convening grand juries, investigating possible crimes. General/Judge Mukasey cites the newly expanded 'executive privilege' to shield the justice department from oversight, just as his opponents anticipated.
Senator, you got some 'splainin' to do! You have betrayed your party, your constituents, and your constitution.