EPA Set To Turn a Blind Eye to Rocket Fuel Components In Drinking Water

Submitted by JC on September 22, 2008 - 7:59am.

According to a report in this morning's Washington Post, the Environmental Protection Agency is likely going to bow to extensive political pressure from the White House and Pentagon and rule that it will not set a safety standard for the amount of perchlorate allowed in drinking water. Perchlorate is a component of rocket fuel that has been shown to cause thyroid problems in pregnant women, newborn babies and young children.

For six years, career scientists at the EPA have urged regulations on the chemical and have been opposed by White House and Defense Department political forces. The Office of Management and Budget heavily edited the EPA's proposed ruling, and went as far as to ask the EPA to use a different computer modeling system to determine the allowable levels of the chemical. OMB's preferred model was developed by the Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology.

The politicization that has run rampant through the Bush Administration is a detriment to one of our government's most basic functions--protecting its citizens from harm. We have seen in it in the perversion of Justice at DOJ, and here it is again in the manipulation of scientific research at the EPA.

 

Blind eye?

Off the table?

Six of one...half a dozen of the other.

Too bad our Democratic leaders in the Judiciary Committee are too frightened to do what it takes to stop it.

Get the log out of your own blind eye Mr. Conyers, and tell Pelosi to "Go Cheney Herself" while you're at it.

Of all the articles

in all the papers you chose this one to serve to us?
If the EPA is powerless why is it still there on our dime?
Our nations water is almost equal with raw sewage,and has been for almost 100 years.
Corporations are the culprits ,and will be until those that have a say in this issue get off thier asses and do something about it.

Pollutants such as benzene lead mercury cadmium asf are just waiting to be consumed.
And then we wonder why we are always sickly!

If the crap heads that are ruining our country actually gave a shit , we wouldn’t have to loose a thought about our water and food.
What about the chemtrails ? Ever thought about having the EPA look into that issue?
Unless you really want to do something about OUR environment,I suggest you work on issues that are of global necessity,such as the impeachment of those responsible for the terrible mess we are in RIGHT NOW!

Q U E S T I O N:

What do Keith Ellison, Bob Filner, and Sheila Jackson-Lee have in common...?
... They support THIS!

==============
I M P E A C H

Congressman,

I have to take exception with your statement:

The politicization that has run rampant through the Bush Administration is a detriment to one of our government's most basic functions--protecting its citizens from harm. We have seen in it in the perversion of Justice at DOJ, and here it is again in the manipulation of scientific research at the EPA.

If this Administration's actions are to be determined a "detriment" to "protecting citizens from harm"... what are you doing about it besides belly-aching and stepping aside from halting further actions? Did you think it would stop...? What do you think will stop it? Surely doing nothing is tantamount to tacit approval. Something MLK Jr. shook his finger at!

If this Administration's actions are not to be determined to be a "detriment" to "protecting citizens from harm"... then you're just blowing hot air.

Your Oath of Office compels you to do more than belly-ache and blow hot air...
... Especially when it comes to "protecting citizens from harm" from threats inside our Government.

NO?

Either the actions are a detriment or they are not. IT CAN NOT be both...
Make up your mind and get off that fence post!

IMHO the "perversion" is the trust squandered that was granted to the Congress to right the wrongs. Letting them continue is NOT righting the wrongs, that's called "TURNING A BLIND EYE" !

==============
I M P E A C H
or R E S I G N!!!

Prosecuting High-level

Prosecuting High-level Americans for War Crimes
JURIST Guest Columnist Benjamin Davis of the University of Toledo College of Law says "the whole world is watching" efforts in the United States - highlighted at a recent conference at Andover - to bring U.S. high-level civilians and/or generals to justice for crimes committed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars....

On September 13-14, 2008, over two hundred people from the United States and abroad gathered in Andover. Massachusetts for the Justice Robert Jackson Conference on the Planning for Prosecution of High Level American War Criminals sponsored by the Massachusetts School of Law. Video of the two day conference and the program are available here. As a participant, I'm providing this note to JURIST as an aide-memoire for those concerned about war crimes perpetrated by US officials that have gone unpunished over the past eight years.

Impeachment of Bush-Cheney

Notwithstanding Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's statement that impeachment of the most senior member of the Administration is off the table, the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney was very much on the table at the conference. In particular, it was noted that the time remaining for the Bush-Cheney administration is about the same time as it took for the impeachment of President Clinton. Moreover, the idea of a post-January 2009 impeachment of Bush and/or Cheney was raised so that they would be barred from any Federal office (such as work on federal commissions etc that prior-Presidents and Vice-Presidents have done) if the impeachment were successful. Beyond Bush and Cheney, a suggestion was made to impeach Judge Jay Bybee of the Ninth Circuit because of his enabling of torture in the now infamous Bybee-Yoo "torture memo."

Local, state and federal criminal prosecution

Local efforts such as the Brattleboro, Vermont, ordinance that calls for the arrest on sight of Bush and/or Cheney if they enter the city limits were discussed. One particular scenario examined by participants was to charge Bush and Cheney with murder of U.S. soldiers who have died in the Iraq and Afghanistan war under state law. Vincent Bugliolsi and others examined the possibilities for such criminal prosecution in state court. A candidate for Attorney General in Vermont, Charlotte Dennett, advised that if she were elected she would consider opening state murder prosecutions against Bush and Cheney. One strategy that was discussed was the possibility of having hundreds of local DA's of the 2700 in the United States start those prosecutions in municipal courts. These state criminal prosecutions would put pressure or make it easier for a federal district attorney to find the fortitude to open federal criminal complaints against United States high-level civilians and/or generals for murder and torture and/or cruel inhuman or degrading treatment. Evaluation of a broad range of potential crimes including such crimes as obstruction of justice, criminal use of classified documents, etc and the other crimes that typically catch high-level civilians was encouraged in an effort to find ways to vindicate international law rules through the domestic courts. The use of common law courts in places, such as Florida, was examined as a means to turn revisionist international law theory to the advantage of those seeking prosecution by asserting customary international humanitarian and human rights law violations as common law applicable in state courts prosecutions. The Federal Assimilated Crimes Acts could also make federal charges on customary international law grounds a possible avenue for criminal prosecution.

Foreign and international prosecution

The participants analyzed the status of and possibilities for foreign prosecution of U.S. high-level civilians and/or generals in foreign domestic courts under universal jurisdiction. The recent failed efforts in Germany and France with regard to Rumsfeld were noted. It was pointed out, however, that we should take advantage of the fact that more and more countries are enacting universal jurisdiction legislation. Efforts in England against similar persons in the English political establishment were noted. One of the more interesting tactics described started with over 200 citizens going to their local police stations in England and reporting a crime had been committed - referring to the Iraq War or torture. The police have a duty to investigate and this is a manner in which the ordinary citizen in England could get the wheels of justice rolling.

As to international prosecution, the participants discussed the possibility of referrals to the International Criminal Court of United States high-level civilians and/or generals based on crimes committed in countries which adhere to the ICC. It was noted that prosecutors in a number of foreign countries have based their politically motivated dismissals of complaints against high US officials on the mistaken notion that the accused would be prosecuted in the US (the principle of complementarity) as well as on incorrect theories of immunity. The view discussed at the conference was that domestic U.S. efforts and foreign and/or international efforts for criminal prosecution should go forward at the same time so as each can help the other advance as fast as practicable.

State licensing complaints

Complaints to state licensing authorities for psychologists and lawyers were examined as a means to sanction those who are considered to have broken the law and betrayed their professional oaths.

Political will for prosecution

Many people were shocked by the tactics used by police against demonstrators at the Denver and St. Paul political conventions. It appears that room for dissent in the United States has been significantly narrowed. Notwithstanding this state of affairs, ideas for action to build the political will for criminal prosecution of American war criminals abounded. A march of lawyers on the Justice Department - taking inspiration from the lawyers in Pakistan - was suggested to assert the need to take back the Justice Department and have it now enforce the law instead of flout it. Creative methods of demonstrations by diverse groups to encourage criminal prosecution were discussed. T-shirt campaigns, support of local and national candidates, a plethora of ideas blossomed in the discussions.

To help in thinking about 17 specific directions in which efforts could go, it was proposed that a Central Committee be created to try to coordinate the diverse activities related to developing more political will and developing the criminal prosecutions. Participants at the conference are reaching out to persons and organizations who have been fighting to support the rule of law the past eight years in civil cases or in political action, in order to help all aspects of the effort to criminally prosecute these high-level civilians and generals. The Central Committee has already held its first telephone conference and links are being developed with all organizations and persons of goodwill who will support this effort.

While many thought that prosecutions would now have to wait until the next administration, none thought that a future Republican of Democratic Administration could be counted on to pursue criminal prosecution. The need for citizens to take up the call and pressure the powers at the local, state and national level to take up criminal prosecution and/or impeachment was acutely felt.

It became abundantly clear to all present that "the whole world is watching" efforts in the United States to bring U.S. high-level civilians and/or generals to justice through criminal prosecution. These ordinary citizens appeared willing to take up the challenge - even if it takes years - of building the political will and getting the successful prosecutions completed. We must remember that there is no statute of limitations for murder and for many international crimes. Rather than despair, the participants recognized that they need to be determined, disciplined, and prepared to deal with agents provocateurs used by brilliant adversaries in this effort.

Benjamin Davis is a professor at the University of Toledo College of Law

September 22, 2008

==============
I M P E A C H
THEM BOTH !!!

...







(sorry video is cut short)

PRESS RELEASE

On Tuesday morning, September 23, 7:30am, at the front of the National Archives Building on Constitution Ave. in Washington, D.C., five military veterans will risk arrest as they climb a 9-foot retaining fence and occupy a 35-foot high ledge to raise a 22x8 foot banner stating, "DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION. ARREST BUSH AND CHENEY: WAR CRIMINALS!"

The group has declared its intention to stay on the ledge, fasting for 24 hours "in remembrance of those who have perished and those still suffering from the crimes of the Bush administration," according to a written statement. With a portable PA system, they will broadcast recorded statements from prominent Americans for the impeachment and/or arrest of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. "Citizens Arrest Warrants" will be distributed to people waiting in line to enter the National Archives.

The veterans emphasized they are taking this action because "Bush and Cheney's serial abuse of the Law of the Land clearly marks them as domestic enemies of the Constitution, they have illegally invaded and occupied Iraq, deliberately destroyed civilian infrastructure, authorized torture, and unlawfully detained prisoners. These actions clearly mark them as war criminals, accountability extends beyond impeachment to prosecution for war crimes even after their terms of office expire."

"We take this action as a last resort," their statement added. "For years we have pursued every avenue open to good, vigilant citizens to bring these men to justice, to re-establish the rule of law, and to restore the balance of power described in our Constitution. We are not disturbing the peace; we are attempting to restore the peace. We are not conducting ourselves in a disorderly manner; our action is well-ordered and well-considered. We are not trespassing; we have come to the home of our Constitution to honor our oath to defend it."

Those participating are all members of Veterans For Peace and include Elliott Adams: 61, NY, VFP President and former Army paratrooper in Viet Nam; Ellen Barfield: 52, MD, former U.S. Army Sgt., full-time peace and justice advocate; Kim Carlyle: 61, NC, mountain homesteader, former Army Spec 5, 828-626-2572; Diane Wilson: 59, TX, shrimp boat captain, former Army medic, 361-785-4680; Doug Zachary: 58, TX, VFP staff, former USMC LCpl discharged as a conscientious objector, 512-791-9824; and Tarak Kauff (ground support) 67, NY, painting contractor, former U.S. Army Airborne.

==============
I M P E A C H M E N T
IS CONSTITUTIONAL !!!

SURPRISE...


... October Surprise, that is.

Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/

...
Other branches included
The active Army’s new dwell-time mission is part of a NorthCom and DOD response package.

Active-duty soldiers will be part of a force that includes elements from other military branches and dedicated National Guard Weapons of Mass Destruction-Civil Support Teams.

A final mission rehearsal exercise is scheduled for mid-September at Fort Stewart and will be run by Joint Task Force Civil Support, a unit based out of Fort Monroe, Va., that will coordinate and evaluate the interservice event.

In addition to 1st BCT, other Army units will take part in the two-week training exercise, including elements of the 1st Medical Brigade out of Fort Hood, Texas, and the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade from Fort Bragg, N.C.

There also will be Air Force engineer and medical units, the Marine Corps Chemical, Biological Initial Reaction Force, a Navy weather team and members of the Defense Logistics Agency and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
...

John,
The National Guard has always been at home to help at home and respond at home in times of need at home...
NEVER has the US ARMY been deployed at home in anticipation of disaster...
They have assisted the National Guard... at home in response to disaster. But that was when the National Guard was at home under the control of each Governor. But now, the Army gets to take their place because the National Guard has been taking the place of the Army, abroad?

I smell more than what the MSM isn't telling us... Their perfume and rouge and lipstick and 3 carrot diamond earrings on this pig can't change the fact that this is still a pig!

Each day is only another inch...
Each week is only another half foot...
Each month is only another yard...
Each year is only another 1/3 of a football field...
... over that precipice.

How you can ignore each inch...
... is beyond comprehension.

What exactly is the Army preparing for at home?
It's not like the boarders aren't secured...
It's not like shipping isn't safe...
It's not like the elections won't be called off...
... IS IT?

Regulatory agencies are only as effective

as the congressional committees that oversee them.

The refusal of members of Congress to use their full constitutional powers to stop the abuse by this administration is also a perversion of the functions of our government.

FEIN: Impeachable

FEIN: Impeachable offenses?
Bruce Fein
Tuesday, September 23, 2008

COMMENTARY:

Have President Bush and Vice President Richard Cheney committed impeachable offenses for which the duumvirate should be convicted and removed from office by duping then-House Majority Leader Richard K. Armey into supporting legislation authorizing war against Iraq with twin lies -- that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had personal ties to Osama bin Laden's terrorist network; and that Saddam had miniaturized nuclear weapons, which could be unleashed by employing al Qaeda as a delivery system?

The facts - uncontradicted by either Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney - are chronicled in Barton Gellman's new book "Angler."

In late September 2002, Majority Leader Armey met the vice president in H-208 in the Capitol Building. Mr. Armey was no liberal or RINO (Republican In Name Only). He adamantly opposed taxes and earned a stellar 97 percent rating from the American Conservative Union during his long years in Congress. But Mr. Armey initially opposed an Iraqi war authorization because Saddam was no menace to the security of the United States. If Mr. Armey voted no, he would give political cover to any Democrat or Republican Doubting Thomas to vote likewise and probably foil an Iraqi war resolution.

Mr. Cheney's mission was to flip Mr. Armey. He succeeded by stooping to lies that bettered the instruction of President Clinton's perjury in Monicagate that occasioned Mr. Clinton's impeachment. According to Mr. Armey, Mr. Cheney sounded the tocsin that Iraq's "ability to miniaturize weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear," had been "substantially refined since the first Gulf war." They were "miniaturizing weapons, developing packages that could be moved even by ground personnel." Not a crumb of intelligence supported these falsehoods.

Without any supporting evidence, Mr. Cheney also maintained that al Qaeda was "working with Saddam Hussein and members of his family." He falsely added that "we now know [Iraq] ha* the ability to develop these [nuclear] weapons in a very portable fashion, and they have a delivery system in their relationship with organizations such as al Qaeda."

The vice president's lies convinced Mr. Armey to vote in favor of the Iraqi war resolution. Relying on the deceit, the majority leader explained his flip-flop on the floor of Congress: "If you're going to conduct a war on terrorism, then you must stop that person who is most likely and most able to arm the terrorists with those things that will frighten us most."

After discovering the truth, Mr. Armey lamented he could probably have prevented the Iraqi war debacle: "Had I known or believed then what I believe I know now, I would have publicly opposed the resolution right to the bitter end, and I believe I might have stopped it from happening, and I believe I would have done a better service to my country had I done so."

Indeed, the war in Iraq has diverted hundreds of billions of dollars that could have been better spent upgrading defenses at home; strengthened Iran, arch-enemy of the United States; caused vastly more American deaths and injuries than did the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks; and made the United States less safe by creating new enemies in Iraq by flouting its sovereignty and killing innocent civilians in pursuing genuine insurgents or terrorists.

Under the law of impeachment, Mr. Bush is responsible for the misdeeds of his agents in the executive branch, including the vice president. James Madison, father of the Constitution, amplified in the House of Representatives that the president would be subject to impeachment, "if he suffers [his subordinates] to perpetrate with impunity high crimes and misdemeanors against the United States, or neglects to superintend their conduct, so as to check their excesses." Vice President Cheney, in contrast to other executive branch officials, does not serve at the pleasure of the president.

But in approaching Mr. Armey in support of Mr. Bush's legislative initiative authorizing war against Iraq, Mr. Cheney was acting as Mr. Bush's agent for whom the president was accountable.

Article II, section 4 of the Constitution declares the, "president [and] vice president ... shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of ... high crimes and misdemeanors." Alexander Hamilton explained in Federalist 65 that impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors are "political" offenses because "they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to society itself." James Iredell, later appointed to the Supreme Court by President George Washington, made explicit at the North Carolina ratification convention that presidential duplicity with Congress over war or comparable matters of great national moment would be an impeachable offense.

Although his statement specifically addressed lies to the Senate, its rationale applies equally to deceit of the House of Representatives to obtain an authorization for war: "The president must certainly be punishable for giving false information to the Senate. ... If it should appear that he has not given them full information, but has concealed important intelligence which he ought to have communicated, and by that means induced them to enter into measures injurious to their country, and which they would not have consented to had the true nature of things been disclosed to them - in this case, I ask whether, upon an impeachment for a misdemeanor upon such an account, the Senate would probably favor him."

Mr. Armey should be summoned to testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee about his statements in "Angler" implicating Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney in lies to dupe the House of Representatives over war in Iraq. The president and vice president should be given an opportunity to respond under oath but subject to cross-examination.

If the totality of evidence corroborates Mr. Armey's recollection, shouldn't the House immediately vote to impeach Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney and send their cases for trials in the Senate? Wouldn't that action honor the original intent of the Founding Fathers that the Bush administration professes to cherish?

• Bruce Fein is a constitutional lawyer at Bruce Fein & Associates Inc. and author of "Constitutional Peril: The Life and Death Struggle for our Constitution and Democracy" (Palgrave Macmillan).

Now Congressman,
While you're content in assuming that the elections will magically restore the Rule of Law, how are any us to believe you when you refuse to do so now?

... Because you say so...?
HA! Evidence: The Rule of Men continues...

==============
I M P E A C H
or R E S I G N!!!

RFK Jr: “Votes being stolen by 100,000's” & Dems not stopping it

Mr. Chairman, many people are spending countless hours registering people to vote. Yet, the republicans are working feverishly to strike those names off the voter rolls & “The Democrats are Doing Nothing to Stop It” !!

“…Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: There are about 30 scams the Republicans are deliberately using, particularly in the swing states to get Democratic voters off the rolls. These scams originate in the so-called Help America Vote Act, which was passed after the Florida debacle in the year 2000. It was originally suggested by Democrats and Republicans, but it was passed by a Republican Congress with a Republican senate and a Republican president. And instead of reforming what happened in Florida it basically institutionalized all the problems that happened in Florida. And institutionalized a series of impediments that make it very difficult for Democrats to register, for Democrats to vote and then for Democrats to have their votes counted….”

“One of these requirements under HAVA is called 'the perfect match,' and what that does is little known but it is devastating. A quarter of the voters in Colorado have just been removed from the rolls because of this--[and] just this one scam. And what it does is, they use a computer system to compare your registration application to all [your] other government records in the state. So they'll look at your Social Security records, your Motor Vehicle records, and any time you've had any interaction with the government, and if there is any information on your voter registration that is different than the information on another government record that they find, they remove you from the voting rolls….”

“Papantonio: Are the Democrats suing to stop this?

RFK, Jr.: No, the Democrats are doing nothing to stop it…”

Mr. Chairman, do the Democrats actually WANT to win the November election?

Greg Palast and RFK Jr....

pt. 1
pt. 2

Sir this would be funny if it wasn't so sad

Seems to me that it is being swept under the rug... Damn shame

Testimony describes phantom contracts, who in the current government is corrupt, and how it is happening. Worth the time while waiting for the economy to fail....

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&cPath=6_11&products_id=281266-1&highlight=

Well, J.C.

Forgive the familiarity, but I think you could use a friend right about now. And in keeping with that role, I have to say that, judging by the popular sentiment expressed on your blog, you f***ed up about 2 years ago. You lost credibility that now can never be retrieved. You let the criminals get away with it. You made yourself complicit in their crimes. You failed the American people and you failed the Constitution. You failed your party and you failed your own conscience. I'm not going to say what you want to hear; I'm going to say what you need to hear.

You did all this simply by not taking a stand against the Bush Administration when you had your chance. You made all kinds of campaign promises to us and when it came time to deliver, you buckled. In your own words, "...and that is that". How can we trust you?

Now, with only a few months left in their reign, they've managed to create yet another crisis. They've managed to create a 'solution' that will cost us 700 billion dollars. But you have to act now or else the whole system will collapse. John, we've heard this before. Remember the last crisis? They said the consequences of inaction then could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

What I'm not hearing or reading about is what happens after the bailout. What happens to the economy when we pay top dollar for toxic debt that cannot be repackaged and resold. Its toxic, remember? Nobody wants it. Nobody's saying what happens to the value of a dollar when up to 700 billion dollars hits the markets. Nobodys saying what that will do to inflation or the price of oil and gasoline. I'm not hearing anyone talking about the inflationary hit that main street will take by this bail out of Wall Street.

Think about who we're bailing out. Most of them knew what they were doing when they took those risks. They work with risk for a living. They knew.

We've been led to believe the Federal Reserve Board worked day and night to come up with a three page solution. But the White House press secretary stated that "we've been working on this for weeks and months". Weeks and months? You mean they've been planning this $700 billion 'bailout' for weeks and months? But everyone on the news is saying this is an emergency plan - a seat of the pants fix. We're not supposed to look into the details until they have their $700 billion dollars and absolute power delivered to their hands. We're supposed to look at the consequences of inaction like it was a brick wall. We're not supposed to look any further than that. We're supposed to look and be very afraid.
Sound familiar?
Sounds a bit like the financial declaration of war?

And with it, we're supposed to give the Fed and the Sec. Treasury unlimited powers to take over any financial institution they desire, without the institution having any recourse to the law.
Sound familiar?
Sounds a bit like the financial Patriot Act?

Don't be fooled. They plan on doing to the credibility of the American Financial institutions what they did to the American human rights record. And they're going to trade $700 billion dollars in cash for worthless debt in return for hundreds of millions in future GOP campaign contributions at the taxpayers expense. And when that money hits the markets, the resulting inflation will make the 70s seem like a pleasant memory.

We were warned about this. We were told they plan on crashing the system through apocalyptic spending. We were warned about the Bush Administrations penchant for turning every crisis into a cah giveaway for their partisans. We knew their plan to deal with the crushing national debt was to shrink it through hyper inflation. And now we're seeing it unfold.

But the members of Congress will be fed lies and fear until they capitulate; just like the run up to the Iraq war. I'm saying this to you as a friend; look at the consequences of dumping all that cash on the markets. Look at the value of what we're supposedly getting for that money. Look at the price on which they plan to buy that crap. There's no chance of getting our money back. The inflation it will cause will destroy America. You think the price of oil was high at $147/barrel? The American economy crashes at $240/barrel no matter what you do. And dumping that much money onto the markets will almost certainly bring us to the brink. The 'cure' is every bit as bad as the disease.

Now I'm not saying we should do nothing. I'm saying we need to really scrutinize the plans of those who have no credibility. Don't be fooled again.

Thank you.

For more information: see http://market-ticker.denninger.net/